By Dennis Romboy and Lisa Riley Roche
ALT LAKE CITY — Gov. Gary Herbert said Thursday lawmakers need to address both religious liberty and anti-discrimination this session, preferably in a single bill that makes it clear the state's LGBT community is protected from discrimination.
"I would be very disappointed if I had a bill for religious freedom that did not include anti-discrimination," the governor told reporters. "Whether that rises to the level of a veto, I guess we need to see, but I would be very unhappy."
Herbert also said that even though it doesn't matter to him "as long as we get the right results," the legislation may need to refer specifically to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people.
"If we need to spell out LGBT to make sure that the gay community knows they are part of all of Utah" that the state is trying to avoid discriminating against, the governor said, "that doesn't cause me heartburn."
The governor's comments came as lawmakers attempt to balance religious rights and anti-discrimination, which could hinge on how they interpret statements The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints made on the issues last month.
Legislators are at odds over whether to specifically carve out protections for LGBT Utahns while at the same time guaranteeing religious freedom.
"It comes down to the interpretation of the meaning of what the church said," said Rep. Jacob Anderegg, R-Lehi. "The question is: Can we ever get to a middle ground?"
Asked whether that would be easier without the church publicly stating its position, Anderegg said, "Easier? No. Less muddy? Yes."
Senate President Wayne Niederhauser, R-Sandy, said the Legislature "through our process is trying to figure out what it all means."
I would be very disappointed if I had a bill for religious freedom that did not include anti-discrimination.
–Gov. Gary Herbert
The LDS Church called on government officials to protect religious rights while also protecting LGBT Utahns from discrimination in housing, employment, and public accommodations such as restaurants, hotels and transportation.
Church leaders also emphasized that people should not be forced to perform services that go against their religious beliefs.
Anderegg has a bill that would allow people authorized to solemnize marriages to decline if it violates their religious beliefs. But he said he's still looking at options on how best to balance religious exemptions while guaranteeing access for all, and he doesn't know whether he'll run the bill at all.
The topic of performing marriages came up during the exchanges the governor and House Speaker Greg Hughes, R-Utah, had with reporters Thursday.
Herbert said he would “probably respectfully decline” if asked to perform a wedding for a same-sex couple. He said he would not want to conduct a same-sex marriage.
“I’m not obligated to do it. It’s not like a clerk or somebody who has a government responsibility. I just have the ability to perform a marriage,” the governor said.
The House speaker, however, said he would officiate at such a wedding.
“I don’t have any problem with it,” Hughes said. “If I was asked, I probably would act within the responsibilities I have without pause.”
Herbert said it's not going to be easy to come up with a balance between religious liberty and anti-discrimination, but said there needs to be a way to address, for example, a baker being asked to decorate a cake with a swastika.
"It is a challenging thing. It’s not just about gay rights or anything else. It’s about when do you cross the line into my own personal view of what I think is right or wrong based on my own religious persuasion," Herbert said.
Still, the governor said it's the right time to tackle the issue, following recent court decisions allowing same-sex marriage and LDS Church leaders calling for action.
"I think we ought to get ahead of the curve on this and pass an appropriately balanced religious freedom law as well as anti-discrimination for the gay community and all Utahns," he said, that can be a model for the rest of the country.
Rep. LaVar Christensen, R-Draper, is proposing a bill that would add religious liberty provisions to the state's anti-discrimination and fair housing laws.
I don't find anti-discrimination and religious liberty to be opposed to each other, or different concepts. I think we're talking about the same thing.
–House Speaker Greg Hughes
HB322 would guarantee "perfect toleration of religious sentiment" and that "rights of conscience shall never be infringed." It also says the legal exercise of religious liberty is a recognized defense to claims of discrimination.
The bill provides for fair access to employment and housing, but does not include specific protections against discrimination of LGBT people.
Read the entire article and make comments at: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?sid=33452782&nid=148&title=lawmakers-aiming-to-balance-religious-rights-and-anti-discrimination&s_cid=queue-8
